<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Score on The CineBlog</title>
    <link>https://thecineblog.com/tags/score/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Score on The CineBlog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:00:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://thecineblog.com/tags/score/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>It Follows: The Paranoia of the Wide Angle</title>
      <link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/it-follows/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/it-follows/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The modern horror film is obsessed with the jump scare. The camera frames a character tightly, the music drops to silence, and something loud jumps out from just off-screen. It is cheap, biological manipulation. David Robert Mitchell’s &lt;em&gt;It Follows&lt;/em&gt; rejects this entirely. It generates terror not by hiding the monster, but by showing you exactly where the monster is, in a massive, inescapable frame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-deep-focus-threat&#34;&gt;The Deep-Focus Threat&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitchell and cinematographer Mike Gioulakis abandoned traditional, tight horror framing in favor of extreme wide-angle lenses and deep-focus photography. By holding these tableau-like shots for agonizingly long durations, they weaponize the audience&amp;rsquo;s own eyes. You are forced into a state of active paranoia. You stop looking at the actors in the foreground and start obsessively scanning the deep background, looking for anyone walking at a steady, inexorable pace.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
