<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Digital on The CineBlog</title>
    <link>https://thecineblog.com/tags/digital/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Digital on The CineBlog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:00:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://thecineblog.com/tags/digital/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Tangerine: The Liberation of the Smartphone Sensor</title>
      <link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/tangerine/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/tangerine/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The camera is a tool of exclusion. A standard Panavision package costs more to rent for a week than most independent filmmakers will raise in a lifetime. When Sean Baker set out to make &lt;em&gt;Tangerine&lt;/em&gt; with a restrictive $100,000 budget, he did not settle for a cheap prosumer camera. He made a radical, liberating choice: he shot a feature film on three iPhone 5s units.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;engineering-the-aesthetic&#34;&gt;Engineering the Aesthetic&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baker understood that shooting on a phone would be dismissed as a gimmick if it &lt;em&gt;looked&lt;/em&gt; like a phone. To combat this, he engineered a highly specific workflow. He attached Moondog Labs anamorphic lens adapters directly to the iPhones. This instantly forced the clinical, square digital sensor into a classic, &amp;ldquo;cinemascope&amp;rdquo; widescreen geometry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lady Bird: The Aesthetic of the Xerox Copy</title>
      <link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/lady-bird/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/lady-bird/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Digital cinema is often too clean. The ARRI Alexa Mini, natively, produces an image so sharp and vivid that it leaves no room for the fuzziness of human memory. When Greta Gerwig and cinematographer Sam Levy approached &lt;em&gt;Lady Bird&lt;/em&gt;, a film entirely about the unreliability and nostalgia of adolescence, they knew they had to aggressively break the digital image.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-xerox-concept&#34;&gt;The Xerox Concept&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During pre-production, Levy found inspiration in physical degradation. By running reference photographs through a color photocopier multiple times, he watched the image lose &amp;ldquo;generations&amp;rdquo; of quality. The resulting texture—faded, slightly distorted, a copy of a copy—became the foundational visual language of the film. To teenagers in the early 2000s, the world was experienced through these exact kinds of cheap, analog reproductions taped to bedroom walls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
