<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Casting on The CineBlog</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/tags/casting/</link><description>Recent content in Casting on The CineBlog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 20:47:48 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thecineblog.com/tags/casting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Angel and the Badman: A West Without Dust</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/angel-and-the-badman/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/angel-and-the-badman/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I will talk mostly about the dirt, because the two critics I trust on this film arrived at the same place from different doors, and the place is clean. Julio Quintana&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Angel and the Badman&lt;/em&gt;, a remake of the 1947 Western that John Wayne produced for himself and James Edward Grant wrote and directed, went wide through Angel Studios on October 9 and had taken about $3.6 million by the middle of the month, against notices that Wikipedia, with its usual tact, summarizes as negative. Roger Moore&amp;rsquo;s complaint is the one a working crew will recognize instantly: everything in the frame looks tidy, freshly laundered and pressed. The house is newly painted, the barn looks new, the plow Penny hitches still has, in his joke, the showroom price tag on it. Scott Renshaw does not mention the paint; he finds the story a slog and the lead unconvincing from the first scene. Both are describing the same failure, and it is a failure of texture before it is one of casting.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Family Movie: The Gimmick Is the Budget</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/family-movie/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/family-movie/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Every family that has ever made a film together has had the same argument at the same table, and &lt;em&gt;Family Movie&lt;/em&gt; is the first one I know of to sell tickets to it. Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick direct, with Dan Beers writing the concept they sparked to; their children Sosie and Travis Bacon act; and the conceit is a low-budget horror film about a family making a low-budget horror film, which is either the laziest idea in the world or the most honest, depending on whether you have ever had to cast your own cousin because the day rate was zero. It premiered at SXSW on a Friday the 13th, in the Narrative Spotlight, with Gersh selling and no distributor yet attached at the time Deadline wrote it up. Deadline loved it. AwardsWatch gave it a D+. I find both verdicts defensible and the gap between them more interesting than either, because the gap is exactly where micro-budget meta films live.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Primetime: The Documentarian Points a Fiction Camera</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/primetime/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/primetime/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;What happens when a documentarian makes his first fiction feature about television? You get a film in which every charge the critics file reads, from another angle, like a description of the method. Lance Oppenheim is thirty, formed entirely in nonfiction, the HBO series &lt;em&gt;Ren Faire&lt;/em&gt; behind him and an Elizabeth Holmes film co-directed with Nathan Fielder ahead, and &lt;em&gt;Primetime&lt;/em&gt;, his first scripted picture, released by A24 from a screenplay by the equally first-time Ajon Singh, takes as its subject Chris Hansen and the Dateline NBC machine of &lt;em&gt;To Catch a Predator&lt;/em&gt;. Robert Pattinson plays Hansen. The reviews are split down a line so clean you could light it: everyone admires the surface, and everyone files the same complaint about what is under it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tony: Filming the Man Before the Myth</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/tony/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/tony/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I will restrict myself to one question, because it is the question this film lives or dies on: how do you photograph a man the whole world has already memorized, at the age before he was anyone? Anthony Bourdain has been mythologized without pause in the years since his death, and the field of posthumous product is exactly as lurid as you fear. Matt Johnson&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;Tony&lt;/em&gt;, for A24, written by Todd Bartels and Lou Howe, answers the question with a scope decision so severe it amounts to a manifesto: one summer, 1975, Provincetown. A nineteen-year-old washes dishes badly, lies about everything, and gets, in the words of &lt;em&gt;Kitchen Confidential&lt;/em&gt; that open the film, the good ass-kicking he badly needs. The show, the fame, the voice, none of it appears. The film ends before the man begins.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Slacker: The Baton-Passing Narrative</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/slacker/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/slacker/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Commercial cinema is terrified of aimlessness. It demands a rigid three-act structure and a clear protagonist to secure funding. Richard Linklater&amp;rsquo;s 1990 debut, &lt;em&gt;Slacker&lt;/em&gt;, completely rejected this convention, opting instead for a non-linear, &amp;ldquo;baton-passing&amp;rdquo; narrative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-drifting-observer"&gt;The Drifting Observer&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The camera acts as a drifting observer across Austin, Texas. It picks up a conversation, follows it for a few minutes, and then seamlessly hands the narrative off to a new character who happens to cross their path. There is no central plot, only an endless relay race of philosophical ramblings, conspiracy theories, and existential ennui.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kids: The Ethnography of Casting</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/kids/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/kids/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To capture the unfiltered, destructive reality of New York youth in his 1995 film &lt;em&gt;Kids&lt;/em&gt;, photographer-turned-director Larry Clark knew that traditional Hollywood casting would fail. You cannot hire a casting director to find a Juilliard-trained 18-year-old and expect them to convincingly portray the hyper-specific, chaotic reality of a downtown skateboarder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-participant-observer"&gt;The Participant-Observer&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, Clark became a participant-observer. He spent three years embedding himself within the downtown NYC skateboarding community, gaining the trust of the teenagers before a camera ever rolled. He learned their language, observed their behavior, and mapped their social dynamics. He approached the narrative film as if it were a strict ethnographic documentary.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Elephant: The Banality of the Tracking Shot</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/elephant/</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/elephant/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To depict a horrific school shooting is to invite the trap of Hollywood sensationalism. Melodrama, rapid editing, and theatrical pacing invariably cheapen the tragedy. To avoid this, director Gus Van Sant implemented a rigorous &amp;ldquo;one rule&amp;rdquo; constraint for his 2003 film &lt;em&gt;Elephant&lt;/em&gt;: the camera must never stop moving, and the actors must never stop being themselves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-drift-of-the-steadicam"&gt;The Drift of the Steadicam&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cinematographer Harris Savides executed this through a series of long, languid, unbroken Steadicam tracking shots. The camera drifts through the high school hallways like a detached, &amp;ldquo;fly-on-the-wall&amp;rdquo; observer. By holding these tracking shots for extended, unbroken periods, Van Sant intentionally stretches time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Beasts of the Southern Wild: The Texture of the Bayou</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/beasts-of-the-southern-wild/</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/beasts-of-the-southern-wild/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When you cast a Hollywood actor to play a bayou fisherman, the audience knows they are watching a performance. Benh Zeitlin understood this fundamental problem. To authentically capture the gritty, isolated culture of the Louisiana bayou in &lt;em&gt;Beasts of the Southern Wild&lt;/em&gt;, he rejected traditional Hollywood casting entirely. He anchored his $1.8 million production on untrained, non-professional actors sourced directly from the local community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="authentic-casting"&gt;Authentic Casting&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Casting a local baker as the lead is a massive financial and narrative risk, but the reward is absolute, unvarnished authenticity. The film does not feel performed; it feels documented. The actors brought the geography of the bayou in their bones, saving Zeitlin the impossible task of directing a professional actor to mimic a lifetime of southern hardship.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Short Term 12: The Engine of Empathy</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/short-term-12/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/short-term-12/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When a production is starved of money, directors often make the mistake of over-compensating with stylistic gimmicks to make the film look &amp;ldquo;cinematic.&amp;rdquo; Destin Daniel Cretton took the opposite approach with &lt;em&gt;Short Term 12&lt;/em&gt;. He realized that when you are confined to a single location with a $400,000 budget, your greatest visual effect is human empathy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-contained-narrative"&gt;The Contained Narrative&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The film is set almost entirely within the pressure-cooker environment of a residential foster-care facility. Cretton did not try to expand the scope to make the film feel bigger. He turned the financial constraint of a 20-day, single-location shoot into a narrative weapon. By trapping the audience in the facility, the film focuses exclusively on character dynamics. The narrative is not driven by external plot mechanics; it is propelled forward entirely by the volatile, unpredictable emotional states of the teenagers and the staff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Rider: The Refuge of Fiction</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/the-rider/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/the-rider/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The camera is a predatory instrument. When you point it at real people suffering real tragedy, the line between documentation and exploitation becomes dangerously thin. In &lt;em&gt;The Rider&lt;/em&gt;, Chloé Zhao navigates this ethical minefield not by shooting a straight documentary, but by constructing a highly specific fiction around a devastating reality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="casting-the-truth"&gt;Casting the Truth&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zhao did not cast actors to play cowboys. She cast Brady Jandreau, a genuine rodeo rider, shortly after he suffered a real, near-fatal head injury that ended his career. She cast his actual father, his actual sister, and his actual best friend, Lane Scott, who was left severely disabled by his own rodeo accident.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Climax: Engineering Chaos</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/climax/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/climax/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The modern film set is a bureaucracy. It is choked by storyboards, rigid shooting schedules, and actors who demand motivation before they take a breath. Gaspar Noé recognizes that bureaucracy is the death of kinetic energy. To capture true delirium in &lt;em&gt;Climax&lt;/em&gt;, he had to orchestrate a production as chaotic as the film itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="production-mechanics-the-15-day-nightmare"&gt;Production Mechanics: The 15-Day Nightmare&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bref&lt;/em&gt;, Noé shot the entirety of &lt;em&gt;Climax&lt;/em&gt; in just 15 days. He completely discarded the traditional script format, entering production armed with nothing but a sparse 1-page outline. The dialogue and the agonizingly complex choreography were heavily improvised on the floor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Eighth Grade: The Courage to Cast Reality</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/eighth-grade/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/eighth-grade/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hollywood is terrified of actual teenagers. For decades, studios have cast perfectly polished twenty-five-year-olds to play high school students. This cowardice results in a sanitized, plastic version of adolescence. In &lt;em&gt;Eighth Grade&lt;/em&gt;, Bo Burnham recognized that to capture the terrifying reality of Generation Z anxiety, he could not hire professionals playing dress-up. He had to hire the real thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="directing-the-performance-actual-children"&gt;Directing the Performance: Actual Children&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bref&lt;/em&gt;, Burnham insisted on casting actual eighth graders. He discovered lead actress Elsie Fisher on YouTube. She had graduated from the eighth grade a mere week before principal photography began.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Talk to Me: The YouTube to Feature Pipeline</title><link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/talk-to-me/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/talk-to-me/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bref&lt;/em&gt;, the old guard of the film industry looks at YouTubers with a mixture of confusion and profound disdain. We see loud teenagers making prank videos and assume they have no discipline for the grueling marathon of feature filmmaking. But Danny and Michael Philippou proved exactly why this arrogance is fatal. With &lt;em&gt;Talk to Me&lt;/em&gt;, they didn&amp;rsquo;t just transition from YouTube to a $4.5 million A24 feature; they brought the frantic, fearless energy of the internet and weaponized it within a traditional production structure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>