<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>35mm on The CineBlog</title>
    <link>https://thecineblog.com/tags/35mm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 35mm on The CineBlog</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:00:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://thecineblog.com/tags/35mm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Past Lives: Capturing the Tactile Passage of Time</title>
      <link>https://thecineblog.com/stories/past-lives/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://thecineblog.com/stories/past-lives/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bref&lt;/em&gt;, the modern film industry is terrified of celluloid. When a first-time director approaches a studio and asks to shoot their debut feature on 35mm film, the executives immediately calculate the shipping costs, the processing fees, and the horror of the blind daily rushes. They will offer you a high-end digital sensor and promise that the colorist can &amp;ldquo;add grain in post.&amp;rdquo; But Celine Song refused the compromise. For &lt;em&gt;Past Lives&lt;/em&gt;, shot on a $12 million budget, she demanded actual film. Why? Because you cannot digitally manufacture the weight of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
